21/01/2014
The latest....
Stop Demand
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 13:26:43 +1300
Subject: Miss Pings - s*xual denigration of women
To: Miss Pings
To Nick, Anthony, Josh & Tom (could someone please forward this to Tom)
Stop Demand Foundation works to reduce s*xual violence, s*xual
exploitation and s*xual denigration of women and children
www.stopdemand.org Our Board comprises three men and three women.
We are writing to you in your capacity as directors of Miss Pings.
Last week we were copied in to an email thread between a member of the public and Miss Pings (emails below). To follow up, on Friday evening two of us from Stop Demand spent a couple of hours at Miss Pings over some drinks. We unsuccessfully sought out Anthony. During that time we used, and checked, the bathrooms.
We fully endorse the concerns, and questions, raised by Judi
Lambourne. More specifically,
1. Po*******hy: Your collages that feature images of women with their legs spread open, a focus on their 70's-style p***c areas, large breasts, etc. juxtaposed for the most part against fully clothed men is po*******hy, not nakedness. A number of your images reduce women, and their value, to their ge****ls and breasts for the male gaze, s*xual arousal and titillation. Some images would, legally, be classified "Restricted" (R18 or R16 material, legally required to be cellophane-wrapped).
2. Imposed po*******hy: Why do you/Miss Pings assume you have the right to impose Restricted material on unsuspecting patrons, men and women, uninvited? Doesn't that smack of arrogance?
3. Illegality: Miss Pings is in breach of the law to be displaying
p**nographic/Restricted material to anyone under the age of 18. (Judi Lambourne observed children present during her visit. Likewise, we note that one restaurant reviewer took her "tweenager" - a child 8 to 14 - to your venue.) For this reason alone, your collages should be removed immediately. We note Anthony's comment, "If people believe the images are offensive, especially to children, we will certainly take them down." The point about children is not up for debate; it's the law!
4. R**e culture: One image is particularly disturbing (attached).
Displaying a cartoon of a fearful-looking woman, naked but for high
heels, tied to a pole, and about to be s*xually assaulted (unwanted
s*xual touching = s*xual assault) by two Martians is puerile, twisted, r**e-fantasy and r**e supporting - and completely irresponsible. We note Anthony's trite, "I don't think we're trying to say anything specifically apart from 'aren't these cool to look at'. NO, Anthony, Nick, Josh and Tom. These images are NOT cool. This particular image is especially offensive.
5. Hostile workplace: Miss Pings can quite fairly be accused of
creating a potential hostile working environment for its female staff. Po*******hy in the workplace is odious enough and has been the subject of a number of Court cases. Adding alcohol to the mix
increases that risk of hostility. It is quite feasible for a patron,
already with unhealthy attitudes towards women, to have a few beers, use your toilets, have his views reinforced with your demeaning images, and view your female staff as nothing more than "t**s and fannies" (as Judi Lambourne puts it), whose only value is for f***ing.
6. Disrespect: Your deliberate choice of toilet decor implies you
have little, or no, respect for (a) your women staff; (b) your women patrons; and (c) women and girls in general. It also smacks of an unhealthy sense of male s*xual entitlement.
7. Commercial sense: It makes no commercial sense why you would risk alienating customers like Judi Lambourne.
8. Facebook: We would not support Anthony's suggestion to put the issue up on Facebook for discussion. There are countless misogynists, r**e apologists, young men of the Roast Busters ilk, p**n-using men, rapists, males who lack respect for women, and men like yourselves who are possibly quite decent but naive and insightless, who would support your current decor.
Guys - s*xual callousness, s*xual exploitation and s*xual violence
does not take place in a vacuum. They are underpinned and fuelled by a bombardment of cumulative messages and images, about power constructs, roles of men/women, s*xual entitlement/subjugation, etc. Miss Pings, right now, is adding to that mire, negatively. We urge you to think more deeply about these issues.
We appreciate that Miss Pings is a pop-up venue with a limited time frame. Nonetheless, we would ask you to remove this objectifying (in the case of under 18s, illegal) material immediately. If the material is still there on Saturday morning (25 January), then as a campaigning organisation we will be obliged to look at taking further steps.
Given Anthony's reasonable response to Judi Lambourne we are
confident, and hopeful, that this will not be necessary.
Yours sincerely
Denise Ritchie
Founder
How Evolved are You?
http://www.stopdemand.org/wawcs0156073/how-evolved-are-you.html
Did you know: Teenage girls of p**n-viewing fathers are now reporting a "yuk" factor? For many, a father's "parental gaze" has become the "p**n gaze".
Reducing male demand fuelling prostitution, po*******hy and s*x trafficking. Men, take action to stop s*xual violence.